I am trying to tie together a whole lot of threads into a coherent whole. This is going to be rough (very very rough), in the first iterations, under I can better sort things out.
Of late, I have been wandering around, trying random things, trying to get socially reconnected. But I am odd. What I find interesting is not what is most common. That means the existing venues are – for me – just not interesting.
The first part of the problem is the shape of our current suburban society. In fact, there is not a whole lot of society. For reasons that are both too simple and too complex, most folk live in a physical and social environment that promotes silos and isolation. No intention, no design – and not enough understanding of the problem.
Well … we cannot revamp the physical world, but perhaps through focused choices, intentional action, we can route around what does not work.
Quite a lot of social coherence grows out of incidental interaction – which for the most part just does not happen by default in suburban society. Can we intentionally build social coherence? I think so. There are always a few exceptional actors, but they need a clear plan, and a plan that works. What plan works?
One notion that I find interesting is Stranger Dinners. I suspect that what works for a single 20-something attractive female as a host does not necessary work for another host or age group … but the base notion is still interesting. The notion of pulling together mostly-unrelated folk for interesting incidental social interaction seems to make some sense – if we can find a simple formula that can be readily replicated, for many hosts.
Pulling folk together outside of our usual silos has to be a primary. Putting together mutually interesting small meetings of dissimilar folk has to be also(?) primary.
- How distinct in terms of group should be each participant?
- Am I massively over-analyzing the problem? (likely)
The above all needs to be reduced to a simple and clear message.