-
Archives
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- January 2004
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: April 2008
Autoconfig
Posted in Humor, Images
Leave a comment
JFC Swing and software entrophy
Been re-working and fixing up a clear example of software entrophy. The sad part is that this is a moderate-sized client part of a client-server application, and reached this state under the original author. So I have spent time (far too much time) looking at fairly awful code.
At the same time this has lead me to look at Swing more closely than I had need before. After poking around in the guts of javax.swing, I came away really unimpressed. Too many half-good ideas. Too much code. Not so much the tight and clean conceptual model one might hope for in “foundation” classes. Admittedly I was not in a very favorable frame of mind.
Looking at all the “loose” (of the late-binding sort) lashing, have to wonder if we’d not be better off using Javascript to describe UI component structures.
Wonder what the internals of SWT look like?
Posted in General
Leave a comment
A bit of pre-historic (for the Internet) history
Years ago the local STOR (in Tustin) was replaced by Ikea. I had not looked before for the backstory.
From 1988: IKEA suit forces STOR to shelve catalog; home furnishings retailer claims copyright infringement
IKEA–with stores in 19 countries including two sites in the U.S.–contends that STOR replicated IKEAs’ furniture, furniture names, signs, testing machines, price tags, department names, color schemes, checkout areas, shopping carts, general store layout and design, and catalogs, and that this replication constitutes unfair competition and copyright infringement.
Um, yes, that would explain why the later Ikea store was so much like STOR.
From 1992: Observers hail Stor-Ikea merger – Stor Furnishings International Inc.; Ikea Svenska AB
Ikea’s announcement last week that it plans to buy City of Industry-based Stor Furnishings International Inc. was lauded by industry sources as a logical culmination of competition between the two furniture retailers and as the best deal for Stor shareholders.
Wonder if the STOR folk made money as copycats. Wonder is Ikea found a ready-made market at former STOR locations.
In any case, pretty cool that bnet.com is placing online stories that pre-date common use of the Internet.
Posted in General
Leave a comment
